Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00061 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 4, 2015)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction Indefiniteness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00061, Dkt. No. 409
Decided
December 4, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DE # 459 from 2:13-cv-1112)
Length
144 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Conten tGuard Holdings, Inc.’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 304),1 the response of Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”), Apple Inc., DirecTV, LLC, HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) (Dkt. No. 331), Defendant Amazon.com, Inc.’s Separate Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case