Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Corp. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00033 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00033, Dkt. No. 582
Decided
September 29, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER AND OPINION WITH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Length
80 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are several equitable remedies and defenses raised by the Parties, in addition to open questions of law under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The first set of issues before the Court relate to Genband’s request for a permanent injunction. As part of this request, Genba nd filed a Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment to Include a Permanent Injunction (Dkt. No. 491.) In response, Metaswitch asserts the equitable defense of laches.