Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Corp. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00033 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2016)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00033, Dkt. No. 425
Decided
January 8, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 258 Sealed Motion to Strike Expert Report of Mark R. Lanning
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a Motion to Strike th e Expert Report of Mark R. Lanning filed by Defendants Metaswitch Networks Ltd and Me taswitch Networks Corp. (collectively “Metaswitch”). (Dkt. No. 258). I. LAW Rule 702 provides that an expert witness may offer opinion testimony if (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is base d on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the pro…