Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Corp. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00033 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00033, Dkt. No. 457
Decided
January 15, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Currently before the Court is Metaswitch’ s Supplemental Brief Regarding Evidence of Alleged Copying (Dkt. No. 420) fi led by Metaswitch on January 7, 2016 objectin g to rulings made by the Court concerning exhibits and deposition designations during the Pretrial Conference. The Supplemental Brief identifies statements made by the Court at the pretrial conference about why evidence of alleged copy ing was admitted over Metaswitch’s objection. The Court issues this Order to clarify any ambi guity or misunderstandings these statements may have engendered.