Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al, No. 2:13-cv-00213 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2018)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00213, Dkt. No. 397
Decided
March 28, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the C ourt is Rembrandt Technologies, LP’s (“Rembrandt”) Motion to Amend Judgement (Dkt. No. 375), in which Rembrandt seeks to “strip out” from the jury’s award those royalties tied to pre-complaint sales on a per-unit royalty calculation. Samsung disputes the pro- priety of Rembrandt’s per-unit approach, which is based on per-unit sales, and instead advances a per-day calculation. The difference in the parties’ approaches amounts to roughly $2.4 million in damages.