Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al, No. 2:13-cv-00213 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Samsung Defendants’ (“Samsung”) Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and/or Rule 59(a) Motion for New Trial on Damages Issues (“Mot.”, Dkt. No. 328). The Court heard argument on November 3, 2015. For the reasons set forth below, Samsung’s Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and/or Rule 59(a) Motion for New Trial on Damages Issues is DENIED1. I. BACKGROUND The Court held a jury trial in this case, and the jury entered a verdict on February 13, 2015. The asserted claims of U.S. Patent No.