Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al, No. 2:13-cv-00213 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 17, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Samsung Defendants’ (“Samsung”) Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and/or Rule 59(a) Motion for New Trial on Liability Issues (Dkt. No. 329 (“Mot.”). The Court heard argument on November 3, 2015. For th e reasons set forth below, Samsung’s Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion fo r Judgment as a Matter of Law and/or Rule 59(a) Motion for New Trial on Liability Issues is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The Court held a jury trial in this case. Th e jury returned a verdict on February 13, 2015. The asserted claims of U.S. Patent No.