Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al, No. 2:13-cv-00213 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Order Regarding Motion to Exclude Opinions of Roy Weinstein. (“Defendants’ Objections”) (Dkt. No. 264.) After reviewing Defendants’ Objections, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge’s rulings neither “clearly erroneous [n]or contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)( 1)(A); FED.R.CIV.P. 72(a). Accordingly, Defendants’ objections are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge’s Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Opinions of Roy Weinstein (Dkt. No.