Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cassidian Communications, Inc. v. Microdata GIS, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00162 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2015)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00162, Dkt. No. 225
Decided
April 20, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Airbus DS Communications’1 Motion to Correct Inventorship of U.S. Patent No. 6,744,858 (“’858 Patent”) According to 35 U.S.C. Section 256 and Federal Rule of Procedure 60(b) Motion to Vacate the Judgment Th at Claims of the Patent are Invalid (Dkt. No. 206, filed August 26, 2014.) The Court also ta kes notice of the briefing in the appellate record that resulted in the related remand to th is Court from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.