Cassidian Communications, Inc. v. Microdata GIS, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00162 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Cassidian Communicatio n, Inc.’s Motion for an Indicative Ruling Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1 (Dkt. No. 216, filed October 16, 2014.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Cassidian’s Motion (Dkt. No. 216) for an indicative ruling that the Court will grant an earlier Cassidian motion. APPLICABLE LAW Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“F.R.C.P”) 62.1 provides for an “Indicative Ruling on a motion for Relief that is Barred by a Pending Appeal”: (a) Relief Pending Appeal.