Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cassidian Communications, Inc. v. Microdata GIS, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00162 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:12-cv-00162, Dkt. No. 201
Decided
August 8, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Length
43 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DI STRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CASSIDIAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. P l a i n t i f f , v. MICRODATA GIS, INC. MICRODATA, LLC, and TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM, INC. D e f e n d a n t s . § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00162-JRG MEMORANDUM AND OPINION On December 20, 2013, after a five day jury trial, a jury in this patent infringement case reached a verdict. ( See Dkt. No. 155.) The jury found that (1) Plaintiff Cassidian Communications, Inc.