Adrain v. Vigilant Video, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00173 (E.D. Tex. May 13, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is John B. Adra in’s Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringeme nt Contentions (Dkt. N o. 121), Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (D kt. No. 126), and related brie fing. In Adrain’s Motion for Leave, Plaintiff seeks to amend its infringement contentions to incorporate newly-issued claims in the reexamined ’669 patent, specifically new claims 30-32, 35-39, and 41-42. After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court finds as follows: I.