Adrain v. Vigilant Video, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00173 (E.D. Tex. July 5, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the construction of the parties’ disputed claim terms, which the Court previously addressed in its April 19, 2012 Preliminary Markman Order. (Dkt. No. 97.) That Preliminary Order is superseded by this expanded claim construction order; and this Order is and shall be effective as of April 19, 2012 . The Court will first briefly address the patent -in-suit and then turn to the merits of the claim construction issues. I. BACKGROUND AND THE PATENT-IN-SUIT On May 26, 2010, John D.