Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adrain v. Vigilant Video, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00173 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2011)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00173, Dkt. No. 52
Decided
March 25, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss is DENIED
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Ma gistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 42), which contains his reco mmendation that the court deny defe ndant City of Port Arthur’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 11), has been presen ted for consideration. Neither party filed an objection to the report and recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the conclu sions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case