Adrain v. Vigilant Video, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00173 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 21, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff John B. Adrain’s (“Adrain”) Emergency Motion to Stay Pending Outcome of Re -Examination (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 78.) The Court set an expedited briefing schedule (Dkt. No. 79) and the matt er has now been fully briefed. After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court DENIES the Motion. II. Facts Adrain filed this suit on May 26, 2010, alleging that Defendants Vigilant Video, Inc.