Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 2:08-cv-00369 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00369, Dkt. No. 508
Decided
October 27, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendants Inequitable Conduct Counterclaims Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 223) and Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants Inequitable Conduct A…
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Currently pending before the Court are four motions seeking to dismiss Defendants’ counterclaims and affirmative defenses relating to inequitable conduct. (Dkt. No. 223, 224, and 225) Specifically, Plaintiff seeks to dismiss and all Defendants’ inequitable conduct affirmative defenses and counterclaims under Rule 12(f) and Rule 12(b)(6), respectively, for failure to comply with Rule 9 (Dkt. Nos. 223 and 224). Having reviewed the briefing, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motions1 should be DENIED. II.