Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 2:08-cv-00369 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2010)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00369, Dkt. No. 437
Decided
August 19, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - before the court are numerous motions relating to discovery and other patent matters. The court's rulings on docket numbers 298, 300, 301, 302, 305, and 313 are set forth herein (see order for details)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Currently pending before the Court are numerous motions relating to discovery and other patent matters. The Court’s rulings on docket numbers 298, 300, 301, 302, 303, 305, and 313 are set forth below. II. Discovery Motions A. Docket Number 298: Defendant Sony’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Clawed Back Documents After an in camera review of the documents over which Plaintiff is asserting privilege, the Court concludes that Sony’s motion should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.