Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 2:08-cv-00369 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 27, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00369, Dkt. No. 442
Decided
August 27, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER Resolving Claim Construction Disputes
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arguments of counsel, the court issues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction In this case, plaintiff MedioStream, Inc. contends that Defendants infringe various claims1 of U.S. Patent No. 7,009,655 (“the ‘655 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,283,172 (“the ‘172 patent”). The patents cover software for the conversion of video to playback media standard formats and the authoring of this converted video to standard optical media such as DVDs, VCDs, and SVCDs.