MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 2:08-cv-00369 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2010)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction Currently pending before the Court are numerous motions by Plaintiff to amend its infringement contentions as to numerous defendants (Dkt. Nos. 304, 306, 308, 309, 310, 311, and 365) and to compel discovery from Microsoft, Sonic Solutions, and Nero (Dkt. Nos. 307, 312, and 320). Having reviewed the briefing and the parties’ oral arguments, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff’s motions for the reasons set forth below. II. Factual Background Plaintiff brought suit against Microsoft alleging infringement of U.S.