Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. June 4, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 225
Decided
June 4, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Defendants Citrix Systems, Inc. and Citrix Online, LLCs (collectively, Citrix) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,061,796. (Dkt. No. 164)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Citrix Systems, Inc. and Citrix Online, LLC’s (collectively, “Citrix”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non -Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,061,796. (Dkt. No. 164.) After carefully considering the parties’ arguments and written submissions, t he motion is DENIED. II. Facts & Procedural Background SSL Services, LLC (“SSL) filed suit on April 11, 2008, alleging that Citrix infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 6,061,796 (“the ‘796 patent”) and 6,158,011 (“the ‘011 patent”).