Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 63
Decided
February 10, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying SSL's motion to compel
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the court is Plaintiff SSL Services, LLC’s (“SSL”) Motion to Compel Defendants’ Production of Dama ges Expert Reports. After c onsidering the parties written submissions and the applicable law, the Court is of the opin ion that SSL’s motion should be DENIED. SSL alleges that Defendants Citrix Systems, Inc. and Citrix Online, LLC (collectively “Citrix”) infringe claim 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,061,796 (“the ‘796 patent”). The ‘796 patent issued on May 9, 2000.