Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. June 4, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 223
Decided
June 4, 2012
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING Plaintiff SSL Services, LLCs (SSL) aubert Motion Limiting the Testimony of Defendants Damages Expert, Dr. Charles R. Mahla. (Dkt. No. 163.)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff SSL Services, LLC’s (“SSL”) Daubert Motion Limiting the Testimony of Defendants’ Damages Expert, Dr. Charles R. Mahla. (Dkt. No. 163.). After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions and the arguments of counsel, the motion is DENIED. II. Facts SSL filed suit on April 11, 2008, alleging that Citrix Systems, Inc. and Citrix Online LLC (“Citrix”) infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 6,061,796 (“the ‘796 patent”) and 6,158,011 (“the ‘011 patent”).