Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cardsoft, Inc. et al v. Verifone Holdings, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00098 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00098, Dkt. No. 527
Decided
September 29, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff CardSoft’s (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC (“CardSoft”) Motion for Bill of Costs (D kt. 513, filed January 21, 2014). Having fully considered the parties' arguments and for th e reasons set forth here in, the Court hereby GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN- PART Plaintiff CardSoft’s Motion for Bill of Costs and ORDERS Defendants VeriFone Syst ems, Inc., VeriFone Inc. (c ollectively, “VeriFone”), and Hypercom Corporation (Hypercom”) to pay CardSoft’s costs in the amount of $121,039.53.