Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cardsoft, Inc. et al v. Verifone Holdings, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00098 (E.D. Tex. June 4, 2012)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00098, Dkt. No. 377
Decided
June 4, 2012
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - DENYING #297 Defendants Motion to Strike the Expert Reports and to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Mark S. Brown, Plaintiffs Expert on Damages
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Expert Reports and to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Mark S. Brown, Plain tiff’s Expert on Damages (Dkt. No. 279, filed February 16, 2012). The Court finds APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the tr ier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the produ…