Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cardsoft, Inc. et al v. Verifone Holdings, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00098 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00098, Dkt. No. 71
Decided
February 10, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - after reviewing the parties briefs and applicable case law, the court DENIES the motion for the reasons set forth herein
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is Defendant Shera International Ltd. (“Shera”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. (Dkt. # 66) After reviewing the parties’ briefs and applicable case law, the court DENIES the motion for the reasons set forth below. I. Introduction Plaintiffs bring this patent infringement action against several defendants, including Shera. Shera is a privately owned, international corporation organized under the laws of Hong Kong, China. Shera’s principal place of business in Shanghai, China.