Cardsoft, Inc. et al v. Verifone Holdings, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00098 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant VeriFone Systems, Inc. ’s and VeriFone, Inc.’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (hereinafter “JMO L Mot.”, Dkt. No. 425) and Corrected Motion for New Trial (hereinafter “NT Mot.”, Dkt. No. 432). APPLICABLE LAW A. Judgment as a Matter of Law Judgment as a matter of law is appropriate “[ i]f a party has been fully heard on an issue during a jury trial and the court finds that a re asonable jury would not ha ve a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the party on that issue . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P.