Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mondis Technology Ltd v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00565 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00565, Dkt. No. 658
Decided
August 22, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the following reasons the Court DENIES InnoLuxs 579 motion to compel
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Chimei-InnoLux Corp.’s and InnoLux Corp.’s (collectively “InnoLux” or “Defendant”) Motion to Compel that was filed post -trial in this case. (Dkt. No. 579.) Mondis Technology, Ltd.’s (“Mondis” or “Plaintiff) opposes the motion . The Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments in the briefing and this Court has also conducted a hearing. For the following reasons the Court DENIES InnoLux’s motion. I. Background This motion to compel arises because Plaintiff’s expert, Mr.