Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mondis Technology Ltd v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00565 (E.D. Tex. May 5, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00565, Dkt. No. 419
Decided
May 5, 2011
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The Court GRANTS Mondiss motion to supplement its infringement contentions pursuant to Patent Rule 3-6 (Case No. 2:08-CV-478 TJW, Dkt. No. 149) and InnoLuxs motion for leave to amend its invalidity contentions…
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Mondis Technology Ltd.‟s motion to supplement its infringement contentions pursuant to Patent Rule 3 -6 (Case No. 2:08 -CV-478-TJW, Dkt. No. 149) and Defendants Chimei Innolux Corp.‟s and Innolux Corporation‟s motion for leave to amend its invalidity contentions (Case No. 2:07 -CV-565-TJW-CE, Dkt. No. 355). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS these motions. I. Background Mondis Technology, Ltd. (“Mondis”) filed a co mplaint for patent infringement on December 31, 2007 against defendants LG Electronics Inc.