Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mondis Technology Ltd v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00565 (E.D. Tex. May 4, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00565, Dkt. No. 418
Decided
May 4, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Defendants Motion to Compel Discovery. (MEMBER Case No. 2:08-CV-478-TJW, Dkt. No. 150.) The Court GRANTS-in-part and DENIES-in-part Defendants Motion to Compel Discovery. The Court further Orders Mondis to pro…
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants‟ Motion to Compel Discovery. (Case No. 2:08 -CV-478- TJW, Dkt. No. 150.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS-in-part and DENIES-in-part Defendants‟ Motion to Compel Discovery. I. Background Mondis Technology, Ltd. (“Mondis”) filed a complaint for patent infringement on December 31, 2007 against defendants LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics, USA, Inc. (collectively “LG”), Chimei InnoLux Corp. and InnoLux Corp. (collectively “InnoLux Corp.”), and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (“Hon Hai”).