Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MHL TEK, LLC v. Nissan Motor Co et al, No. 2:07-cv-00289 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 2, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00289, Dkt. No. 131
Decided
April 2, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - for the foregoing reasons the court denies BMW Manufacturing Co. LLC Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is d efendant BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC’s (“BMWMC”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Memorandum In Support (the “Motion”). The court DENIES the Motion. The defendant states that “BMWMC builds X5 and Z4 model vehicles. . .For cars destined for the US, BMWMC sells the cars to BMW AG, its ultimate parent. BMWNA [BMW of North America, LLC], in turn, purchases vehicles from BMW AG and imports and distributes t hese vehicles f or sale in the United States.