Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Menusoft Systems Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00271 (E.D. Tex. May 26, 2011)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00271, Dkt. No. 316
Decided
May 26, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - denying defendants' motion for a finding of inequitable conduct
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the court is Defendants’ motion for a finding that the patents-in-suit are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct (Dkt. No. 279). Having carefully considered the evidence, and the parties’ arguments, the court concludes that Defendants have failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the patents- in-suit are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. Accordingly, the court DENIES Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND This case was tried to a jury over five days in September 2010.