Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Menusoft Systems Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00271 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00271, Dkt. No. 106
Decided
April 21, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forthin this opinion for the disputed terms of the 850, 325, and 733 patents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others clai…
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This memorandum opinion resolves the parties’ claim construction disputes. I. Introduction Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc. (“Ameranth”) a sserts United States Patent Nos. 6,384,850 (“the ‘850 patent”), 6,871,325 (“the ‘325 patent”), and 6,982,733 (“the ‘733 patent”) against Defendants Menusoft Systems Corp. (“Menusoft” ) and Cash Register Sales & Service of Houston, Inc. (“CRS”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The ‘325 and ‘733 patents are continuations of the ‘850 patent, all of which have a prio rity date of September 21, 1999.