Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Menusoft Systems Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00271 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00271, Dkt. No. 183
Decided
August 17, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 132 Report and Recommendations, denying 113 Sealed Patent Motion filed by Cash Register Sales & Service of Houston, Inc., Menusoft Systems Corporation, denying 51 Sealed Motion, filed by Cash Re…
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 132), which contains his recommendation that the court deny the defendants Menusoft Systems Corporation’s (“Menusoft”) and Cash Register Sales & Service of Houston, Inc.’s (“CRS”) motions for summary judgment of noninfringement (Dkt. No. 51) and invalidity (Dkt. No. 113), has been presented for consideration.