Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Menusoft Systems Corporation et al, No. 2:07-cv-00271 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Induced Infringement Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00271, Dkt. No. 244
Decided
September 13, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 201 Report and Recommendations, 197 Report and Recommendations,
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The undersigned entered two reports and recommendations (Dkt. Nos. 197 & 201), which recommended that the court deny the defendants Menusoft Systems Corporation’s (“Menusoft”) and Cash Register Sales & Service of Houston, Inc.’s (“CRS”) motion for partial summary judgment of no indirect infringement (Dkt. No. 142) and motion for summary judgment of no hierarchical tree format (Dkt. No. 136) re spectively.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case