Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Medtronic Vascular, Inc. et al v. Boston Scientific Corp et al, No. 2:06-cv-00078 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00078, Dkt. No. 287
Decided
February 11, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying #286 motion to vacate judgment and enter stipulated dismissal with prejudice
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Vacate Judgment and Enter Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice (Docket Entry #286). In their motion, plaintiffs Medtronic Vascular, Inc.’s, Medtronic USA, Inc.’s, Medtronic, In c.’s, and Medtronic Vasc ular Galway, Ltd.’s (collectively, “Medtronic”) and defendants Boston Scientific Corporation, SciMed Life Systems Inc. and Boston Scientific SciMed, Inc.