Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Medtronic Vascular, Inc. et al v. Boston Scientific Corp et al, No. 2:06-cv-00078 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2008)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00078, Dkt. No. 276
Decided
August 29, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - The court finds that the Fitzmaurice patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,190,358 and 6,605,057, are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct committed during their prosecution; however, BSC has failed to meet its …
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. BACKGROUND In this case, plaintiffs Medtronic Vascular, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medronic Inc., and Medtronic Vascular Galway (collectively, “Medtronic,” “Bard,” or “pl aintiffs”) obtained a jur y1 verdict of infringement against defendants Boston Scientific Corp., Scimed Life Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. (collectively, “BSC” or “defendants”) with respect to United States Patent Nos. 6,190,358 (“the ‘358 patent”), 6,605,057 (“the ‘057 patent”), and 6,210,364 (“the ‘364 patent”). See Dkt. No. 213 (Jury Verdict).