Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Medtronic Vascular, Inc. et al v. Boston Scientific Corp et al, No. 2:06-cv-00078 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2008)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00078, Dkt. No. 255
Decided
July 11, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER as to BSC's #200 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Paragraph 5. The court concludes that there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find that the BSC products at issue2 infringe the claims of…
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction A jury was empaneled on May 2, 2008, and a trial commenced on November 16, 2007 in the above-titled action with respect to the plaintiffs’ patent infringement claims against the defendants. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, the defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law on various issues. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the court GRANTS Paragraph 5 of the Defendants’ Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 (Dkt. No. 200). II.