Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Medtronic Vascular, Inc. et al v. Boston Scientific Corp et al, No. 2:06-cv-00078 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2007)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00078, Dkt. No. 71
Decided
December 13, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - the court issues the following order concerning the claim constrution issues
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

After considering the submissions and the arg uments of counse l, the Court i ssues the following order concerning the claim construction issues: I. Introduction Plaintiffs Medtronic Vascular, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medronic Inc., and Medtronic Vascular Galway (collectively, “plaintiffs”) accuse Defendants Boston Scientific Corp., Scimed Life Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. (collectively, “defendants”) of infringing claims of United States Patent Nos.