Sensormatic Electronics Corportation v. W G Security Products, Inc et al, No. 2:04-cv-00167 (E.D. Tex. May 5, 2006)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
The plaintiff’s motion to strike invalidity contentions (#90) is granted in part and denied in part. The renewed motion to strike (#133) is denied as moot. 1. Factual Background and Procedural Posture. In this case, the plaintiff sued the defendants for infringement of three United States patents. The technology at issue is electronic article surveillance systems. At issue is the motion to strike invalidity contentions relating to two of those patents, the ‘378 patent and the ‘490 patent.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error