Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sensormatic Electronics Corportation v. W G Security Products, Inc et al, No. 2:04-cv-00167 (E.D. Tex. May 5, 2006)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00167, Dkt. No. 137
Decided
May 5, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND order granting in part and denying in part motion to strike invalidity contention #90 and denying as moot motion to strike invalidity contentions #133
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The plaintiff’s motion to strike invalidity contentions (#90) is granted in part and denied in part. The renewed motion to strike (#133) is denied as moot. 1. Factual Background and Procedural Posture. In this case, the plaintiff sued the defendants for infringement of three United States patents. The technology at issue is electronic article surveillance systems. At issue is the motion to strike invalidity contentions relating to two of those patents, the ‘378 patent and the ‘490 patent.