Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sensormatic Electronics Corportation v. W G Security Products, Inc et al, No. 2:04-cv-00167 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2006)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00167, Dkt. No. 111
Decided
February 9, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
/2006 9:00 AM in (Marshall) before Judge T. John Ward. Pretrial Conference set for 5/25/2006 2:00 PM in (Marshall) before Judge T. John Ward
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Various motions are pending in this patent infringement case. This order resolves the issues relating to the plaintiff’ s motion for leave to supplement (#62) , the plaintiff’s motion to compel (#35), the plaintiff’s motion to disqualify Norman Hansen as an expert for the defendant (#51), and the joint motion to extend pre-trial deadlines and jury selection (#67). 1. The court grants the plaintiff’s motion for leave to supplement its infringement contentions with respect to the ‘490 patent (#62). 2.