Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sensormatic Electronics Corportation v. W G Security Products, Inc et al, No. 2:04-cv-00167 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2005)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00167, Dkt. No. 68
Decided
November 22, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Order entered to resolve the parties' various claim construction disputes as set forth herein
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The court issues this order to resolve the parties’ various claim construction disputes. 1. Introduction. The plaintiff Sensormatic Electronics Corp., asserts various claims of three United States Patents against the defendants, WG Security Products, Inc., and EAS Sensorsense, Inc. The patents relate to electronic article surveillance (“EAS”) tags and systems. EAS systems are used by retailers to inhibit shoplifting. The parties have filed briefs, and the court held a claim construction hearing.