Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC et al v. Telebrands Corporation et al, No. 6:17-cv-00170 (E.D. Tex. July 16, 2018)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:17-cv-00170, Dkt. No. 328
Decided
July 16, 2018
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
REDACTED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs Tinnus Enterprises, LLC’s (“Tinnus”) and Z URU Ltd.’s (“ZURU”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Injunctive Order and Bond Amount (Docket No. 100) and Defendants Telebrands Corp. (“Telebrands”) , Bulbhead.com, LLC (“Bulbhead”), and Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.’s (“Bed Bath & Beyond ”) (collectively “Defendants”) Response to Court’s Order Regarding Form of Injunction (Docket No. 102). On May 19, 2017, the Court issued a sealed Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket No.