Tinnus Enterprises, LLC et al v. Telebrands Corporation et al, No. 6:17-cv-00170 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Tinnus Enterprises, LLC (“Tinnus”) and ZURU Ltd.’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Join ZURU Inc., ZURU LLC, ZURU PTY Ltd., and ZURU UK Ltd. (the “related ZURU entities”) as plaintiffs in this matter. (Doc. No. 177.) Defendants have filed a response in opposition (Doc. No. 200), to which Plaintiffs filed a reply (Doc. No. 206), and Plaintiffs filed a sur -reply (Doc. No. 210). Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments, Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. No. 177) is GRANTED.