Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Scvngr, Inc. v. DailyGobble, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00493 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 26, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00493, Dkt. No. 191
Decided
September 26, 2017
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING the above claim constructions for the patent-in-suit
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Amended Order construes disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 8,639,619 (“the ’619 Patent”). On July 12, 2017, the parties presented oral arguments on disputed terms at a Markman hearing. The Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order on August 10, 2017 resolving the parties’ claim construction disputes. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed an objection (ECF 188) and Defendant filed a response to Plaintiff’s objection (ECF 190).