Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Scvngr, Inc. v. DailyGobble, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00493 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00493, Dkt. No. 189
Decided
September 6, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 140 Sealed Motion to Compel Discovery and for Sanctions. Relevant shall produce all emails sought in this Motion to Compel, except for Document Number Seven, which is protected by attorney-client p…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff SCVNGR, In c. d/b/a LevelUp’s (“LevelUp”) Motion to Compel Discovery and for Sanctions. Doc. No. 140. Defendant DailyGobble, Inc. d/b/a Relevant (“Relevant”) filed a response. Doc. No. 143. Then, LevelUp filed a Reply, Doc. No. 144, and Relevant filed a Sur-Reply, Doc. No. 151. For the reasons below, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. BACKGROUND On May 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed su it against Relevant for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,639,619 (“the ’619 Patent”).