Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Holland L.P., No. 6:13-cv-00366 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Having considered the parties’ written submissions and arg ument at the June 30, 2015 post-trial hearing, and for the reasons below, the Court rules as follows: • Holland L.P.’s (“Holland”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 301) is DENIED; • Plaintiff Georgetown Rail Equipment Company’s (“Georgetown”) Motion for Pre - Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest (Docket No. 298) is GRANTED; • Georgetown’s Motion for Permanent Injunction (Docket No. 299) is GRANTED; • Georgetown’s Motion for Finding of Willful Infringement (Docket No.