Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Holland L.P., No. 6:13-cv-00366 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2014)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00366, Dkt. No. 208
Decided
November 17, 2014
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Georgetown's fourth motion in limine (Doc. No. 192 at 16-17)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Georgetown Rail Equipment Company’s (“Georgetown”) Motion in Limine Number Four (“MOTION”) (Doc. No. 192 at 16-17). Defendant Holland L.P. (“Holland”) filed a response (“RESPONSE”) (Doc. No. 196). The Court heard arguments regarding the motion on October 30, 2014. Georgetown moves the Court to prohibit Holland from presenting evidence or arguments at trial regarding any advice of counsel defense .