Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Georgetown Rail Equipment Company v. Holland L.P., No. 6:13-cv-00366 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00366, Dkt. No. 147
Decided
August 7, 2014
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction Opinion construes term s of Claim 16 in United States Patent No. 7,616,329 (the “‘329 Patent”) . Plaintiff Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. (“Georgetown”) alleges Defendant Holland L.P. (“Holland”) infringes Claim 16 of the ‘329 Patent. I. BACKGROUND In view of the Court’s Order Granting Georgetown’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. Nos. 51, 81) , the Court g ranted Holland’s Letter Brief Requesting an Early Markman Hearing (Doc. No. 57).