Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Network-1 Technologies, Inc v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00492 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 16, 2017)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00492, Dkt. No. 1028
Decided
October 16, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
t W. Schroeder, III on 10/16/2017. (rlf)ORDER ADOPTING 954 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART 825 Defendants' (Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Hewlett-Packard Company) Motion for Summary Judgment of F…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above -entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“Report,” Docket No. 954), which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding Defendants Hewlett -Packard Company and He wlett Packard Enterprise Company’s (collectively, “HP”) Motion for Summary Judgment of FRAND Obligation (Docket No.