Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Network-1 Technologies, Inc v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00492 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00492, Dkt. No. 962
Decided
September 13, 2017
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 821 Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Dr. James Knox. Defendants' motion to strike is denied as to Dr. Knox's apportionment analysis
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Dr. James Knox. Doc. No. 821. The Court held a hearing on this Motion on June 1, 2017. The Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Network-1 Technologies, Inc. (“Network-1”) accuses Defendants1 of infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,218,930 (“the ‘930 Patent”). The ‘930 Patent relates to an apparatus and method for remotely powering access equipment over a 10/100 switched Ethernet network. See ‘930 Patent.